Media Is Ignoring White House Threats to Chrysler’s Non-TARP Lenders


Beckmann: Tom, let me make the argument against you in another way. We’ve heard the President say this, “I wouldn’t want to stand on their side.” Ron Gettelfinger says “Everyone else has made concessions. These people won’t; they’re greedy.” Why not take a concession that is being asked of everybody else and is being accepted by everybody else, including other hedge funds that had bought some of these bonds in Chrysler?

Lauria: Well that’s a great question, because let me tell you it’s no fund standing on this side of the fence opposing the President of the United States. In fact, let me just say, people have asked me who I represent, and that’s a moving target.

I can tell you for sure that I represent one less investor today than I represented yesterday. One of my clients was directly threatened by the White House, and in essence compelled to withdraw its opposition to the deal under threat that the full force of the White House press corps would destroy its reputation if it continued to fight. That’s how hard it is to stand on this side of the fence.

Beckmann: Was that Perella Weinberg?

Lauria: That was Perella Weinberg.
Read The Whole Story

Threating Chrysler’s Non-TARP Lenders should be a impeachable offense! Why isn’t the main stream media reporting on this? Where is MSNBC and The New York Times?

2 comments on “Media Is Ignoring White House Threats to Chrysler’s Non-TARP Lenders

  1. I wonder how the planned public-private partnerships will fare? Prospects are looking piss poor for any fool who trusts the current regime.
    Pisspoorprospectsforplannedpublicprivatepartnerships. PPPPPP … P.

Comments are closed.